Skip to content
Knowledge infrastructure

ENTERPRISE · DIAGNOSTIC

Enterprise knowledge infrastructure diagnostic

Before designing an infrastructure, we need to understand what problem actually exists.

When relevant knowledge is distributed across teams, documents, applications and systems, the same organisation may maintain several versions of reality without being fully aware of it.

The Enterprise Diagnostic defines the problem before a decision is made about implementation.

We analyse which knowledge matters, where it is held, who has authority over it, which definitions conflict and which conditions limit its use.

We do not start with technology

A knowledge problem can look like a search, AI, documentation, process or integration problem.

But implementing a tool before understanding which information should be treated as valid usually transfers the inconsistencies into a new system.

The diagnostic helps separate:

  • structural problems;
  • source problems;
  • authority problems;
  • definition problems;
  • currency problems;
  • access problems;
  • integration problems;
  • and problems that do not require new infrastructure.

What we analyse

The scope is adapted to the domain and the organisation’s complexity.

It may include:

Sources and systems

Where the relevant knowledge currently lives and the role each source performs.

Entities and definitions

Which concepts, products, services, policies, organisations or assets need a stable identity.

Contradictions

Where incompatible, duplicated or ambiguous versions of the same information exist.

Authority

Who may create, validate, modify or withdraw knowledge within the domain being analysed.

Currency

Which information is active, what has been superseded and what needs to be retained as historical information.

Relationships and dependencies

Which information depends on other information to retain meaning and context.

Access and exposure

Which person or system may use specific knowledge, and under what conditions.

AI systems

Which risks arise when assistants, RAG, agents or other systems retrieve and reuse that information.

What we deliver

The diagnostic does not end with a collection of observations.

The deliverable must support decision-making.

Depending on the scope, it includes:

  1. 01a map of the domain analysed;
  2. 02an inventory of relevant sources;
  3. 03critical entities and relationships;
  4. 04contradictions and overlaps;
  5. 05authority criteria;
  6. 06states of currency;
  7. 07reuse risks;
  8. 08access or exposure restrictions;
  9. 09technical and organisational dependencies;
  10. 10intervention priorities;
  11. 11acceptance criteria;
  12. 12a recommendation on whether implementing an infrastructure is worthwhile.

Which decisions it enables

At the end, you should be able to answer more precisely:

  • Which knowledge is worth structuring?
  • Which source should take precedence?
  • Which contradictions need to be resolved?
  • Which information may an AI system reuse?
  • Who should validate changes?
  • What can remain as it is?
  • What should not be built?
  • Is there really a case for a knowledge infrastructure?

Not every diagnostic leads to an implementation

That is a valid outcome.

The problem may be solvable by:

  • correcting a small number of sources;
  • redefining responsibilities;
  • removing duplication;
  • changing a process;
  • improving an existing integration;
  • or limiting how certain systems use the information.

The purpose of the diagnostic is not to justify an infrastructure.

It is to avoid building one when it is not needed.

When this diagnostic makes sense

It is generally useful when:

  • several departments maintain information about the same entities;
  • there are contradictions between systems;
  • a corporate AI project is being prepared;
  • a RAG or assistant returns answers that are difficult to validate;
  • there is uncertainty about which sources should be considered canonical;
  • there are traceability or governance requirements;
  • different applications reuse knowledge without a common policy;
  • there are multiple brands, markets, languages or business units;
  • the organisation needs to decide which knowledge may be exposed to internal or external systems.

What happens next

If the diagnostic concludes that there is a structural problem that warrants an infrastructure, we define the possible implementation scope.

This may include:

  • knowledge model;
  • entities and relationships;
  • governance rules;
  • sources and provenance;
  • evidence;
  • versioning and currency;
  • access conditions;
  • integrations;
  • validation criteria.

Investment

From €4,800 excl. VAT

The price depends on the domain, the number of sources and systems involved, the participating teams and the depth required.

The diagnostic has a fixed scope before work begins.

Before building, define the problem

Starting question

A knowledge infrastructure can become a critical part of an organisation.

That is precisely why it should not begin with a tool or a predetermined architecture.

It should begin with one question:

What does this organisation actually need in order to trust its knowledge?

Frequently asked questions

What does the Enterprise Diagnostic analyse?

Depending on the agreed scope, it analyses the sources and systems involved, critical entities and definitions, contradictions, authority, currency, relationships, access conditions and the risks of reuse by AI systems.

Does the diagnostic require an infrastructure implementation?

No. The diagnostic should make it possible to decide what to retain, what to change, what should not be built and whether there is a genuine case for an infrastructure. Any later implementation is a separate project.

What does the Enterprise Diagnostic deliver?

Depending on the scope, it delivers a domain map, a source inventory, critical entities and relationships, contradictions, authority criteria, risks, dependencies, priorities, acceptance criteria and a recommendation on whether an infrastructure is worth implementing.

When is this diagnostic useful?

It is usually useful when several teams or systems describe the same entities, there are contradictions or doubts about canonical sources, a corporate AI project is being prepared, a RAG system or assistant returns answers that are difficult to validate, or traceability, governance, access or exposure requirements apply.

How much does it cost and what does it include?

The Enterprise Diagnostic starts at €4,800 excl. VAT. Pricing depends on the domain, the sources and systems involved, the participating teams and the depth required. The scope is agreed before work begins and does not automatically include an implementation.